1 00:00:10,400 --> 00:00:08,540 okay guys first first thing I want to 2 00:00:13,340 --> 00:00:10,410 make a very large disclaimer that I have 3 00:00:15,290 --> 00:00:13,350 no knowledge of geology whatsoever I'm 4 00:00:17,630 --> 00:00:15,300 not sure why I'm in this session but I'm 5 00:00:19,040 --> 00:00:17,640 assuming it's appropriate and I would 6 00:00:21,620 --> 00:00:19,050 like to request exemption from any 7 00:00:25,010 --> 00:00:21,630 questions regarding Jamie's claims about 8 00:00:26,560 --> 00:00:25,020 iron and having nothing to ferric to 9 00:00:32,120 --> 00:00:26,570 ferrous having nothing to do with 10 00:00:34,490 --> 00:00:32,130 oxidation in the atmosphere okay so what 11 00:00:37,430 --> 00:00:34,500 I wanted to do is to talk about the iron 12 00:00:41,240 --> 00:00:37,440 the soluble form fe 2 plus and its role 13 00:00:43,580 --> 00:00:41,250 of biochemistry and early Earth so if we 14 00:00:45,740 --> 00:00:43,590 look at the history of biology not 15 00:00:48,650 --> 00:00:45,750 geology history of biology as you see 16 00:00:50,390 --> 00:00:48,660 here we see this large tree of life the 17 00:00:52,280 --> 00:00:50,400 tree of life in modern times is 18 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:52,290 represented by three domains bacteria 19 00:00:57,050 --> 00:00:54,570 archaea and you carry a so if we walk 20 00:00:58,850 --> 00:00:57,060 back in time along that tree of life we 21 00:01:00,590 --> 00:00:58,860 get to what we call Luca last Universal 22 00:01:02,960 --> 00:01:00,600 common ancestor we've all heard of that 23 00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:02,970 by this point which we estimate roughly 24 00:01:08,330 --> 00:01:06,210 is about 3.9 billion years ago if we go 25 00:01:10,910 --> 00:01:08,340 farther back in time we get into this 26 00:01:12,830 --> 00:01:10,920 the squiggly line and the squiggle enos 27 00:01:14,809 --> 00:01:12,840 of this line all that means is that we 28 00:01:16,429 --> 00:01:14,819 are likely to have observed a lot of 29 00:01:18,889 --> 00:01:16,439 horizontal gene transfer during that 30 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:18,899 time so even though last Universal 31 00:01:22,819 --> 00:01:21,090 common ancestor singular most likely 32 00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:22,829 it's a composite of multiple types of 33 00:01:26,870 --> 00:01:24,810 organisms and what we're really dealing 34 00:01:30,260 --> 00:01:26,880 with this far back in time is more like 35 00:01:32,989 --> 00:01:30,270 a soup or sea of different life-forms so 36 00:01:35,840 --> 00:01:32,999 what I want to talk about is this point 37 00:01:37,999 --> 00:01:35,850 of the RNA world hypothesis essentially 38 00:01:40,699 --> 00:01:38,009 in which we theorize there's some kind 39 00:01:43,370 --> 00:01:40,709 of primitive catalysis and maybe some 40 00:01:46,160 --> 00:01:43,380 metal assisted assembly back in that RNA 41 00:01:48,379 --> 00:01:46,170 world so the RNA world hypothesis 42 00:01:51,050 --> 00:01:48,389 essentially states that before modern 43 00:01:53,300 --> 00:01:51,060 biology which is DNA RNA and proteins of 44 00:01:55,249 --> 00:01:53,310 our modern times we have something 45 00:01:57,559 --> 00:01:55,259 called the RNA world in which RNA 46 00:02:00,019 --> 00:01:57,569 perform the roles of genetic storage and 47 00:02:02,749 --> 00:02:00,029 catalysis essentially all the functions 48 00:02:05,510 --> 00:02:02,759 that protein DNA and RNA do together 49 00:02:08,059 --> 00:02:05,520 today and this world is hypothesized to 50 00:02:12,040 --> 00:02:08,069 have occurred back in the early rkm yawn 51 00:02:15,050 --> 00:02:12,050 about 3.8 billion years ago very roughly 52 00:02:17,030 --> 00:02:15,060 so what do we know about modern RNA well 53 00:02:19,070 --> 00:02:17,040 one thing that we study a lot in our lab 54 00:02:19,490 --> 00:02:19,080 Lauren Williams lab at Georgia Tech is 55 00:02:21,920 --> 00:02:19,500 the relation 56 00:02:25,340 --> 00:02:21,930 between RNA and divalent cations 57 00:02:26,990 --> 00:02:25,350 especially magnesium so we know that our 58 00:02:29,180 --> 00:02:27,000 name magnesium have a very special 59 00:02:31,550 --> 00:02:29,190 relationship and it has to do with this 60 00:02:34,010 --> 00:02:31,560 magnesium being a divalent cation having 61 00:02:38,660 --> 00:02:34,020 two charges and really enjoying the 62 00:02:41,660 --> 00:02:38,670 opportunity whoops what did I do okay 63 00:02:43,580 --> 00:02:41,670 sorry I'm really liking to bond with 64 00:02:45,350 --> 00:02:43,590 those phosphates that form the DNA 65 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:45,360 backbone of the RNA background in this 66 00:02:52,610 --> 00:02:50,130 case oops I did it again sorry about 67 00:02:54,740 --> 00:02:52,620 that and we know that I that magnesium 68 00:02:57,260 --> 00:02:54,750 also has very special role in the 69 00:02:59,690 --> 00:02:57,270 folding of large RNAs so there are 70 00:03:01,520 --> 00:02:59,700 certain if you have an RNA that's three 71 00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:01,530 thousand bases long such as what you see 72 00:03:05,300 --> 00:03:02,970 in the ribosome there are certain 73 00:03:07,010 --> 00:03:05,310 conformational spaces or certain 74 00:03:09,530 --> 00:03:07,020 three-dimensional shapes that that RNA 75 00:03:11,720 --> 00:03:09,540 cannot reach without the presence of 76 00:03:15,740 --> 00:03:11,730 magnesium in solution just because of 77 00:03:17,630 --> 00:03:15,750 its size and its charge density so we 78 00:03:20,990 --> 00:03:17,640 see this kind of special relationship in 79 00:03:22,850 --> 00:03:21,000 key lated magnesium motifs like those 80 00:03:25,789 --> 00:03:22,860 found in the ribosome believe there are 81 00:03:28,400 --> 00:03:25,799 23 of these magnesium chelation sites in 82 00:03:31,850 --> 00:03:28,410 the 23s ribosomal RNA we'll talk about 83 00:03:33,070 --> 00:03:31,860 biology more tomorrow but just know the 84 00:03:36,530 --> 00:03:33,080 ribosome is the thing that makes 85 00:03:38,750 --> 00:03:36,540 messenger RNA into proteins and all 86 00:03:41,300 --> 00:03:38,760 cells present in all cells completely 87 00:03:43,820 --> 00:03:41,310 ubiquitous but we see these on chelation 88 00:03:46,310 --> 00:03:43,830 complexes where we have two magnesium 89 00:03:48,050 --> 00:03:46,320 and we have multiple phosphates these 90 00:03:50,240 --> 00:03:48,060 are the phosphates on the back room 91 00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:50,250 interacting with the positive charge 92 00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:52,410 from the magnesium and then if we 93 00:03:56,960 --> 00:03:54,690 superimpose ribosomes from across the 94 00:03:59,449 --> 00:03:56,970 phylogenetic tree of modern life what we 95 00:04:02,150 --> 00:03:59,459 see is that these chelation complexes 96 00:04:04,670 --> 00:04:02,160 this geometry is conserved among all of 97 00:04:10,310 --> 00:04:04,680 life especially if the center of the 98 00:04:12,140 --> 00:04:10,320 ribosome from we're going to get the 99 00:04:16,090 --> 00:04:12,150 prize for them good slide changing this 100 00:04:18,860 --> 00:04:16,100 time so one thing we've done we have a 101 00:04:22,130 --> 00:04:18,870 research scientist in our lab and named 102 00:04:24,860 --> 00:04:22,140 Anton Petrov he's a quantum physicist 103 00:04:26,870 --> 00:04:24,870 and so he's looked at in silico meaning 104 00:04:28,850 --> 00:04:26,880 on computer in mathematical space the 105 00:04:31,730 --> 00:04:28,860 relationship between magnesium and RNA 106 00:04:34,490 --> 00:04:31,740 you see here calcium and are 107 00:04:37,010 --> 00:04:34,500 a its sodium and RNA trying to identify 108 00:04:40,159 --> 00:04:37,020 what is so special about magnesium that 109 00:04:41,689 --> 00:04:40,169 these other cations don't have and so 110 00:04:43,430 --> 00:04:41,699 what you can see in these quantum 111 00:04:45,260 --> 00:04:43,440 mechanical calculations in mathematical 112 00:04:48,050 --> 00:04:45,270 space is that the interaction energy 113 00:04:49,279 --> 00:04:48,060 between RNA and magnesium the 114 00:04:50,990 --> 00:04:49,289 interaction energy between those 115 00:04:53,689 --> 00:04:51,000 backbone phosphates and magnesium is 116 00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:53,699 much more spontaneous so interaction 117 00:04:57,650 --> 00:04:55,410 energies with very large negative number 118 00:04:59,900 --> 00:04:57,660 or more spontaneous we don't have to 119 00:05:02,719 --> 00:04:59,910 adding energy to them in order to the 120 00:05:04,700 --> 00:05:02,729 fore in order to form that structure but 121 00:05:07,580 --> 00:05:04,710 if we look at calcium or sodium we have 122 00:05:09,620 --> 00:05:07,590 a much lower negative number in the case 123 00:05:11,570 --> 00:05:09,630 of calcium or a positive number in the 124 00:05:13,909 --> 00:05:11,580 case of sodium indicating we need to add 125 00:05:17,300 --> 00:05:13,919 some energy to pour that structure to 126 00:05:18,890 --> 00:05:17,310 form now what we are interested in 127 00:05:20,899 --> 00:05:18,900 looking at is whether some other cations 128 00:05:22,939 --> 00:05:20,909 can play the role of magnesium and we 129 00:05:24,589 --> 00:05:22,949 thought we found one we're pretty sure 130 00:05:26,809 --> 00:05:24,599 we found one at this point so if we look 131 00:05:28,790 --> 00:05:26,819 at iron we put iron in place with 132 00:05:30,950 --> 00:05:28,800 magnesium in the same in the same 133 00:05:34,370 --> 00:05:30,960 mathematical space and then we minimized 134 00:05:37,370 --> 00:05:34,380 structure what we get is the same 135 00:05:39,860 --> 00:05:37,380 geometry in the backbone of the RNA with 136 00:05:41,810 --> 00:05:39,870 iron as we do with magnesium we believe 137 00:05:43,670 --> 00:05:41,820 that's because the charge density and 138 00:05:45,830 --> 00:05:43,680 the size of iron is so similar to 139 00:05:48,290 --> 00:05:45,840 magnesium much more similar than any 140 00:05:50,300 --> 00:05:48,300 other cation that we have biologically 141 00:05:52,550 --> 00:05:50,310 available and in the case of iron 142 00:05:55,249 --> 00:05:52,560 actually the interaction energy is a 143 00:05:56,959 --> 00:05:55,259 little bit more negative so the complex 144 00:06:01,909 --> 00:05:56,969 formation that's a little bit better 145 00:06:03,110 --> 00:06:01,919 with iron than with magnesium so based 146 00:06:04,820 --> 00:06:03,120 on this information what we've 147 00:06:07,100 --> 00:06:04,830 hypothesized is the back in the days 148 00:06:08,510 --> 00:06:07,110 when the earth was very unops Akande i 149 00:06:10,370 --> 00:06:08,520 don't think i have to go much into this 150 00:06:13,990 --> 00:06:10,380 at this point i've had a very good 151 00:06:15,950 --> 00:06:14,000 overview today so before protosynth 152 00:06:18,230 --> 00:06:15,960 photosynthesis and the great oxidation 153 00:06:21,320 --> 00:06:18,240 what we had as we've already heard is 154 00:06:23,899 --> 00:06:21,330 that the iron in the ocean be 155 00:06:26,659 --> 00:06:23,909 biologically available to plus form is 156 00:06:28,279 --> 00:06:26,669 probably much greater in concentrations 157 00:06:29,839 --> 00:06:28,289 than it is today and would have been 158 00:06:32,740 --> 00:06:29,849 much more biologically available I 159 00:06:36,140 --> 00:06:32,750 didn't want to mention that iron 160 00:06:38,180 --> 00:06:36,150 two-plus in the presence of oxygen gives 161 00:06:43,070 --> 00:06:38,190 rise to Fintan chemistry which can be 162 00:06:45,290 --> 00:06:43,080 toxic to to biology that's I did also 163 00:06:45,500 --> 00:06:45,300 want to show the banded iron formation 164 00:06:47,720 --> 00:06:45,510 that 165 00:06:49,640 --> 00:06:47,730 you've already seen so the theory is 166 00:06:51,530 --> 00:06:49,650 that it's oxygen increased in the 167 00:06:54,140 --> 00:06:51,540 atmosphere we have the interaction with 168 00:06:56,090 --> 00:06:54,150 the surface oceans and the iron 169 00:06:57,770 --> 00:06:56,100 precipitated out and form these banded 170 00:06:59,720 --> 00:06:57,780 iron formations and this one I believe 171 00:07:03,230 --> 00:06:59,730 is in Minnesota courtesy of Clark 172 00:07:05,030 --> 00:07:03,240 Johnson so our hypothesis is that iron 173 00:07:07,880 --> 00:07:05,040 back in the days when the earth was an 174 00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:07,890 optic actually played the role in RNA 175 00:07:13,010 --> 00:07:09,930 and played the role in life that 176 00:07:15,230 --> 00:07:13,020 magnesium plays today so we wondered 177 00:07:17,090 --> 00:07:15,240 whether we could recreate these early 178 00:07:20,090 --> 00:07:17,100 earth conditions remove the magnesium 179 00:07:22,220 --> 00:07:20,100 remove the oxygen so that the iron would 180 00:07:25,640 --> 00:07:22,230 not eat up the RNA and see if we could 181 00:07:27,950 --> 00:07:25,650 find some kind of activity see if RNA 182 00:07:30,590 --> 00:07:27,960 would do something interesting in the 183 00:07:34,430 --> 00:07:30,600 presence of iron so one of the first 184 00:07:37,510 --> 00:07:34,440 things we did is evaluate like I said 185 00:07:40,900 --> 00:07:37,520 before magnesium is required for RNA to 186 00:07:43,760 --> 00:07:40,910 generate certain conformational States 187 00:07:45,560 --> 00:07:43,770 we wanted to see if iron in the presence 188 00:07:47,510 --> 00:07:45,570 of iron the same conformational states 189 00:07:49,490 --> 00:07:47,520 of RNA could be reached so if you look 190 00:07:52,070 --> 00:07:49,500 here along the x-axis this is 191 00:07:53,870 --> 00:07:52,080 essentially if you imagine this the five 192 00:07:56,270 --> 00:07:53,880 prime end of an RNA to the beginning of 193 00:07:57,860 --> 00:07:56,280 one strand of a molecule and you follow 194 00:08:00,170 --> 00:07:57,870 this along this would be the end of the 195 00:08:02,440 --> 00:08:00,180 Strand of the molecule and along the 196 00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:02,450 y-axis we have essentially the 197 00:08:06,800 --> 00:08:05,010 vulnerability of that molecule to some 198 00:08:10,460 --> 00:08:06,810 kind of external chemical modifying 199 00:08:12,890 --> 00:08:10,470 agent so along this chart along this 200 00:08:15,500 --> 00:08:12,900 graph the higher the peak the more 201 00:08:19,130 --> 00:08:15,510 vulnerable the RNA at that position in 202 00:08:21,740 --> 00:08:19,140 the molecule so if we look at the RNA 203 00:08:23,810 --> 00:08:21,750 and with sodium only we see one 204 00:08:26,330 --> 00:08:23,820 particular pattern of vulnerability 205 00:08:28,040 --> 00:08:26,340 along the bala Kuehl if we add magnesium 206 00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:28,050 we've changed the conformational state 207 00:08:33,409 --> 00:08:31,290 of RNA and we see a different pattern 208 00:08:37,730 --> 00:08:33,419 iron we see almost exactly the same 209 00:08:39,020 --> 00:08:37,740 pattern which is very interesting what 210 00:08:42,200 --> 00:08:39,030 we'd expect based on the in silico 211 00:08:45,290 --> 00:08:42,210 results right so if we look at a 212 00:08:46,790 --> 00:08:45,300 different kinds of enzymatic reaction we 213 00:08:48,140 --> 00:08:46,800 haven't talked about this yet but we 214 00:08:51,140 --> 00:08:48,150 will tomorrow morning ribozymes 215 00:08:54,470 --> 00:08:51,150 ribosomes are like machines like enzymes 216 00:08:56,060 --> 00:08:54,480 like protein machines in this case made 217 00:08:58,820 --> 00:08:56,070 of RNA that can do interesting things 218 00:09:01,280 --> 00:08:58,830 like like eight strands of our 219 00:09:04,300 --> 00:09:01,290 so they can reconnect two strands 220 00:09:07,250 --> 00:09:04,310 together to make one continuous backbone 221 00:09:10,550 --> 00:09:07,260 so what we see in this reaction if we 222 00:09:13,430 --> 00:09:10,560 test the ribozyme with iron in the 223 00:09:17,780 --> 00:09:13,440 absence of oxygen and we subject that to 224 00:09:19,820 --> 00:09:17,790 time what we see is that we get ligation 225 00:09:22,250 --> 00:09:19,830 product with magnesium which is well 226 00:09:23,810 --> 00:09:22,260 documented in the literature but in the 227 00:09:25,700 --> 00:09:23,820 absence of magnesium but the presence of 228 00:09:30,830 --> 00:09:25,710 iron we get a whole lot more like a shin 229 00:09:34,850 --> 00:09:30,840 product which is very cool we can take 230 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:34,860 also take a ribozyme that does RNA 231 00:09:41,180 --> 00:09:38,010 backbone cleavage so it's separating the 232 00:09:44,000 --> 00:09:41,190 RNA backbone and over time look at the 233 00:09:46,130 --> 00:09:44,010 fraction of cleavage product we see that 234 00:09:50,810 --> 00:09:46,140 in the presence of magnesium the 235 00:09:52,790 --> 00:09:50,820 ribozyme cleaves in the presence of iron 236 00:09:55,640 --> 00:09:52,800 only we get a whole lot more cleavage 237 00:09:59,240 --> 00:09:55,650 project product so overall what this is 238 00:10:00,800 --> 00:09:59,250 telling us is that RNA catalytic RNA can 239 00:10:02,810 --> 00:10:00,810 be much more efficient in the presence 240 00:10:05,570 --> 00:10:02,820 of iron than they can be in magnesium as 241 00:10:07,610 --> 00:10:05,580 long as oxygen is absent as long as 242 00:10:11,630 --> 00:10:07,620 we're recapitulating those early earth 243 00:10:13,850 --> 00:10:11,640 conditions so the very last and most 244 00:10:16,280 --> 00:10:13,860 recent experiment that we performed this 245 00:10:18,380 --> 00:10:16,290 one's done by cha longshaw of our group 246 00:10:20,570 --> 00:10:18,390 please check this out this is a very 247 00:10:23,330 --> 00:10:20,580 very cool paper it was just accepted in 248 00:10:24,860 --> 00:10:23,340 nature chemistry so what we what cha 249 00:10:26,690 --> 00:10:24,870 long did is he took a colourless 250 00:10:33,020 --> 00:10:26,700 solution this is tetramethyl benzidine 251 00:10:35,390 --> 00:10:33,030 okay thank you this is a this is 252 00:10:37,310 --> 00:10:35,400 essentially a color eight indicator so 253 00:10:40,490 --> 00:10:37,320 if this tetramethyl benzidine is 254 00:10:42,260 --> 00:10:40,500 oxidized it's going to turn blue very 255 00:10:44,810 --> 00:10:42,270 simple so we take tetramethyl been 256 00:10:48,920 --> 00:10:44,820 setting which is here hydrogen peroxide 257 00:10:50,690 --> 00:10:48,930 which is here here put in the RNA put in 258 00:10:52,880 --> 00:10:50,700 the iron remove the oxygen but not 259 00:10:54,830 --> 00:10:52,890 necessarily in that order and we can 260 00:10:56,380 --> 00:10:54,840 monitor the rate of change of the color 261 00:10:59,260 --> 00:10:56,390 of the solution using a simple 262 00:11:03,470 --> 00:10:59,270 spectrophotometer very simple technique 263 00:11:06,139 --> 00:11:03,480 so we did this or chalam did this not me 264 00:11:08,150 --> 00:11:06,149 so if we monitor this over time 20 265 00:11:12,740 --> 00:11:08,160 minutes here's our solutions 6 micro 266 00:11:14,569 --> 00:11:12,750 molar iron hydrogen peroxide minus this 267 00:11:17,090 --> 00:11:14,579 is supposed to say 02 we can't have 268 00:11:18,889 --> 00:11:17,100 oxygen s reaction if we have no RNA in 269 00:11:23,960 --> 00:11:18,899 the solution we have no color change we 270 00:11:26,569 --> 00:11:23,970 have no electron transfer we add ATP 3 271 00:11:28,160 --> 00:11:26,579 closely spaced phosphate groups which we 272 00:11:33,790 --> 00:11:28,170 would expect to interact with the iron 273 00:11:37,340 --> 00:11:33,800 right we still see no electron transfer 274 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:37,350 we add single-stranded RNA oligomer no 275 00:11:40,490 --> 00:11:38,970 electron transfer we get electron 276 00:11:41,960 --> 00:11:40,500 transfer we're expecting an increase in 277 00:11:44,710 --> 00:11:41,970 the blue color right which is going to 278 00:11:51,530 --> 00:11:44,720 increase this way double-stranded DNA 279 00:11:54,250 --> 00:11:51,540 nothing large viral genome nothing 23 s 280 00:12:00,110 --> 00:11:54,260 ribosomal RNA from thermus thermophilus 281 00:12:02,210 --> 00:12:00,120 voila we have electron transfer p for p 282 00:12:06,079 --> 00:12:02,220 suit 6 domain RNA which is a 283 00:12:10,610 --> 00:12:06,089 well-characterized RNA small RNA we also 284 00:12:12,259 --> 00:12:10,620 have electron transfer and trna also 285 00:12:15,319 --> 00:12:12,269 very well characterized electron 286 00:12:20,990 --> 00:12:15,329 transfer very cool we should be jumping 287 00:12:22,850 --> 00:12:21,000 up and down right now eh along so what 288 00:12:24,800 --> 00:12:22,860 is common among those three RNAs that 289 00:12:27,350 --> 00:12:24,810 the other the other single-stranded RNA 290 00:12:29,300 --> 00:12:27,360 the double-stranded DNA that showed no 291 00:12:31,340 --> 00:12:29,310 reaction whoa what is so special about 292 00:12:32,840 --> 00:12:31,350 this well one thing we know from looking 293 00:12:35,449 --> 00:12:32,850 at three dimensional crystal structures 294 00:12:38,900 --> 00:12:35,459 is that we have these special magnesium 295 00:12:41,180 --> 00:12:38,910 phosphate geometries going on here mag 296 00:12:43,400 --> 00:12:41,190 tRNA is probably the exception to that I 297 00:12:45,139 --> 00:12:43,410 don't know that one one of the magnesium 298 00:12:47,990 --> 00:12:45,149 phosphate backbone geometries has been 299 00:12:52,610 --> 00:12:48,000 observed in TNA tRNA but we do know that 300 00:12:56,629 --> 00:12:52,620 magnesium is very important to tRNA this 301 00:12:58,309 --> 00:12:56,639 reaction also has the same kinetics as 302 00:13:00,800 --> 00:12:58,319 what we call the michelis minton 303 00:13:03,579 --> 00:13:00,810 formalism so it can essentially complies 304 00:13:06,439 --> 00:13:03,589 with the traditional test for an enzyme 305 00:13:08,509 --> 00:13:06,449 which is cool means it saturates itself 306 00:13:10,490 --> 00:13:08,519 so if we limit the enzyme we have plenty 307 00:13:13,009 --> 00:13:10,500 of substrate at some point we're going 308 00:13:14,720 --> 00:13:13,019 to have so much substrate that we're not 309 00:13:16,050 --> 00:13:14,730 going to get any more catalysis per unit 310 00:13:18,450 --> 00:13:16,060 of substrate at it 311 00:13:21,180 --> 00:13:18,460 so conclusions the critical role of 312 00:13:23,130 --> 00:13:21,190 magnesium in RNA if we put it into a 313 00:13:25,500 --> 00:13:23,140 hypothesized early Earth's environment 314 00:13:28,050 --> 00:13:25,510 in the absence of oxygen can be better 315 00:13:31,170 --> 00:13:28,060 served by iron the relationship with 316 00:13:34,530 --> 00:13:31,180 iron and RNA provides a very needed link 317 00:13:37,560 --> 00:13:34,540 between the RNA world and the geologic 318 00:13:41,130 --> 00:13:37,570 record and that RNA may have originally 319 00:13:42,780 --> 00:13:41,140 served the soul roll them sorry iron may 320 00:13:45,210 --> 00:13:42,790 have originally served the made the 321 00:13:47,280 --> 00:13:45,220 predominant role in the early life and 322 00:13:51,210 --> 00:13:47,290 that was later replaced by the oxidation 323 00:13:54,300 --> 00:13:51,220 and that this new RNA world RNA with 324 00:13:55,560 --> 00:13:54,310 iron opens up a new realm of catalytic 325 00:13:58,530 --> 00:13:55,570 functions that have not been previously 326 00:14:01,080 --> 00:13:58,540 characterized I wanted to thank the real 327 00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:01,090 brains behind this not me shillong Shaw 328 00:14:07,010 --> 00:14:03,810 Anton Petrov dr. shreyas Denise Okafor 329 00:14:10,380 --> 00:14:07,020 graduate student and of course our 330 00:14:12,390 --> 00:14:10,390 wonderful p I Lauren Williams is always 331 00:14:14,340 --> 00:14:12,400 there for us as well as Steve Harvey 332 00:14:16,410 --> 00:14:14,350 Nick HUD dr. worked out and many others 333 00:14:22,610 --> 00:14:16,420 of our lab and this is our lab Lauren 334 00:14:22,620 --> 00:14:33,230 all right we can take one quick question 335 00:14:41,180 --> 00:14:37,080 um I saw that you had the sodium control 336 00:14:44,060 --> 00:14:41,190 for your putting RNA with different 337 00:14:47,070 --> 00:14:44,070 rounds have you tried any other divalent 338 00:14:50,940 --> 00:14:47,080 controls like biologically relevant like 339 00:14:52,530 --> 00:14:50,950 calcium or manganese ore no we have not 340 00:14:54,870 --> 00:14:52,540 one thing we do know is when we add 341 00:14:57,780 --> 00:14:54,880 magnesium to they'll elect the electron 342 00:15:00,030 --> 00:14:57,790 transfer reaction it kills it so even if 343 00:15:01,290 --> 00:15:00,040 we have iron there with RNA if we have 344 00:15:02,850 --> 00:15:01,300 magnesium there it's gone but we have 345 00:15:04,650 --> 00:15:02,860 not tried other cations and we don't 346 00:15:06,540 --> 00:15:04,660 have reason based on our end silico 347 00:15:08,610 --> 00:15:06,550 results to believe that those would 348 00:15:11,100 --> 00:15:08,620 actually support any kind of catalysis 349 00:15:17,449 --> 00:15:11,110 that's a great question manganese would